ISHIKAWA V. ULMER - Page 3




          Interference No. 104,214                                   Page 3           
          Ishikawa v. Ulmer                                                           
               FURTHER ORDERED that, based on the record before us,                   
          senior party Ulmer is entitled to a patent containing claims                
          81-84 of its involved 08/877,606 patent application.                        




                            RICHARD E. SCHAFER                                        
                            Administrative Patent Judge                               


                                                               BOARD OF               
                            JAMESON LEE                         PATENT                
                            Administrative Patent Judge       APPEALS AND             
                                                             INTERFERENCES            


                            RICHARD TORCZON                                           
                            Administrative Patent Judge                               























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007