WILSON et al. V. ARNAUD et al. - Page 2




                    ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1, the              
          sole count in the interference, is awarded against junior                   
          party David P. Wilson, Earl A. E. Lund (deceased), Sabatino R.              
          Orfeo, and Joseph M. Garman.                                                
                    FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on priority as to                   
          Count 1 is awarded in favor of senior party Didier Arnaud and               
          Jean-Claude Tanguy.                                                         
                    FURTHER ORDERED that, on the record before the Board              
          of Patent Appeals and Interferences, senior party Didier                    
          Arnaud and Jean-Claude Tanguy is entitled to a patent                       
          containing claims 1-3 (corresponding to Count 1) of U.S.                    
          Patent 5, 188,748, granted 23 February 1993, based on                       
          application 07/658,271, filed 20 February 1991.                             
                    FURTHER ORDERED that junior party David P. Wilson,                
          Earl A. E. Lund (deceased), Sabatino R. Orfeo and Joseph M.                 
          Garman is not entitled to a patent containing claims 3, 8, 35-              
          39 and 41-42 (corresponding to Count 1) of application                      
          08/723,964, filed 26 September 1996.                                        
                    FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement                     
          agreement, attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and                  
          37 CFR § 1.661.                                                             

          ______________________________                                              
          FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior      )                                             
          Administrative Patent Judge   )                                             
                                        - 2 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007