Interference No. 103,730
MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
In the Administrative Patent Judge's order
redeclaring the interference (Paper No. 33), the interference
was changed from a three-party interference (Johnson, Liss,
and Jensen v. Johnson and Liss v. Boatwright) to a two-party
interference (Johnson, Liss, and Jensen v. Boatwright) with
the following claims corresponding to Count 1, the sole count:
(a) Johnson, Liss, and Jensen -- patent claims 3,
4, 8, and 9; and
(b) Boatwright -- application claims 20-23.
Johnson, Liss, and Jensen have requested the entry
of adverse judgment against their claims 3, 4, 8, and 9
pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.662(c) and have also filed a statutory
disclaimer with respect to those claims. Accordingly,
judgment on priority with respect to the count is hereby
entered against those claims, which means Johnson, Liss, and
Jensen are not entitled to a patent containing those claims.
Judgment on the issue of priority with respect to the count
therefore is awarded in favor
- 2 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007