Appeal No. 2000-0027 Page 3
Application No. 09/072,190
described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably
convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the appellant,
at the time the application was filed, had possession of the
claimed invention.
Claims 5, 12, 13 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over Gaudio in view of Grzybowski.1
Claims 1 to 3, 6, 8 to 10, 14, 17 and 19 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Gaudio as
applied to claims 5, 12, 13 and 16 above, and further in view
of Grzybowski.
Claims 4, 7, 11, 15 and 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Gaudio as applied to claims
5, 12, 13 and 16 above, and further in view of Bladykas.
1While the examiner has included Grzybowski in the
statement of this rejection, Grzybowski has not been relied
upon in the body of this rejection. Thus, we consider this
rejection of claims 5, 12, 13 and 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being based on Gaudio alone.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007