THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MARTIN SIGMUNDSTAD
_____________
Appeal No. 2000-0560
Application No. 08/578,636
______________
HEARD: May 16, 2000
_______________
Before CALVERT, FRANKFORT and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges
GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 9, 10 and 12 through 15, which are all of
the claims in the application.
We AFFIRM, but designate our affirmance as a new
rejection pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b).
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007