Ex parte WATSON - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2000-0563                                                        
          Application No. 08/813,965                                                  


          Ulatowski et al. (Ulatowski)            3,934,371           Jan.            
          27, 1976                                                                    
          Haglund                            5,383,739           Jan. 24,             
          1995                                                                        





                                    THE REJECTION                                     
               Claims 14 through 21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                  
          103(a) as being unpatentable over Ulatowski in view of                      
          Haglund.                                                                    
               Attention is directed to the appellant’s main and reply                
          briefs (Paper Nos. 10 and 12) and to the examiner’s answer                  
          (Paper No. 11) for the respective positions of the appellant                
          and the examiner with regard to the merits of this rejection.               
                                     DISCUSSION                                       
               Ulatowski, the examiner’s primary reference, discloses a               
          pivoted door assembly comprising a door frame having a door                 
          jamb 14, a pivotally mounted door 10 having a stile 18, and a               
          safety device which includes rigid elongate finger guard                    
          members 20 fitted to the sides of the stile adjacent the door               
          jamb to fill the gap between the stile and the jamb when the                

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007