Appeal No. 2000-1230
Application No. 08/717,904
Appellants’ argument at page 10 of the brief that the
rejection of claim 13 is improper is not understood, in view
of the fact that the limitations which claim 13 adds to parent
claim 1 are those which appellants have disclosed as being
conventional. The argument that one of ordinary skill would
not have found it obvious to apply the valve of Kinsey to a
plastic tank is not convincing. While the vessel or tank C to
which
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007