Appeal No. 2000-1481 Page 6
Application No. 08/950,130
brief (pp. 1-2), the appellants state that they do not find
support for the examiner's position that Cook teaches that
"LOW PBM has different values at low and high speeds."
After reviewing the teachings of Cook, especially those
portions cited by the examiner, we find ourselves in agreement
with the appellants' position that Cook does not teach that
LOWPBM has different values at low and high speeds (i.e., dual
pressure bias modulation thresholds wherein one threshold is
active at low wheelspeeds and the other threshold is active at
high wheelspeeds). Thus, the modification to Cook found by
the examiner to have been obvious does not arrive at the
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007