Appeal No. 1995-1703
Application 07/897,304
originally filed does not support the invention now claimed is
affirmed;
b) to reject claims 1, 2, 4 through 15 and 18 through 21
under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as being based on a
specification which does not provide an adequate written
description of the claimed invention is reversed; and
c) to reject claims 1, 2, 4 through 15 and 18 through 21
under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as failing to
particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter
the appellants regard as the invention is affirmed with
respect to claims 1, 2 and 4 through 14, and reversed with
respect to claims 15 and 18 through 21.
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
HARRISON E. McCANDLISH )
Senior Administrative Patent Judge)
)
)
)
) BOARD OF
PATENT
LAWRENCE J. STAAB ) APPEALS
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007