Ex parte AGARWAL - Page 1
Legal Research Home >
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2000 > Ex parte AGARWAL - Page 1
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 52
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte SURENDRA H. AGARWAL
__________
Appeal No. 1995-2036
Application 07/920,009
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH and LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision rejecting claims 3, 4,
9 through 11, 16, 17, and 21 through 29, which are all of the claims remaining in the
application.
Claims 23 and 26, which are illustrative of the subject matter on appeal, read as
follows:
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Last modified: November 3, 2007
|
