Paper No. 46
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte CHRISTOPHER H. STROLLE,
CHANDRAKANT B. PATEL,
WERNER F. WEDAM, JUNG WAN KO,
RAYMOND SCHNITZLER and
JONH KYUNG YUN
______________
Appeal No. 1995-3702
Application 07/787,6901
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, RUGGIERO and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
1Application for patent filed November 4, 1991.
According to applicants, this application is a continuation-
in-part of Application 07/635,029, filed December 28, 1990,
now Patent No. 5,037,361, issued August 6, 1991; which is a
continuation-in-part of Application 07/569,029, filed August
17, 1990, now Patent No. 5,113,262, issued May 12, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007