Ex parte SHALATI et al. - Page 7




          Appeal No. 1996-0438                                                        
          Application No. 08/090,343                                                  


          increasing the fluidity of the resin mixture.  Significantly,               
          we find that appealed claim 26 encompasses compositions which               
          comprise a major amount of a polyepoxide and a minor amount of              
          a monoepoxide.  This is so because page 15 of appellants'                   
          specification expressly discloses that "[t]he epoxy compounds               
          can be monoepoxies, or, preferably, a polyepoxide having an                 
          average of at least two epoxy groups per molecule." (emphasis               
          added.) Since the specification discloses that a polyepoxide                
          is preferable to a monoepoxide, it is reasonable to interpret               
          claim 26, by virtue of the "comprises" language, as embracing               
          a major amount of the preferred polyepoxide and a minor amount              
          of the non-preferred monoepoxide.  While appellants maintain                
          that "Heilman teaches only limited                                          





          application of the monoepoxide" (page 4 of appellants'                      
          response of April 3, 1995), the appealed claims encompass                   
          compositions comprising limited, or minor, amounts of a                     
          monoepoxide.  Also, since Heilman teaches that "the                         
          incorporation of a monoepoxy diluent may reduce the cross-                  
                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007