THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 39
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte GARY E. HARMAN,
ROXANNE M. BROADWAY,
ARNE TRONSMO,
MATTEO LORITO,
CHRISTOPHER K. HAYES, and
ANTONIO Di PIETRO
__________
Appeal No. 1996-0657
Application 07/919,784
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before WINTERS, SPIEGEL, and MILLS, Administrative Patent Judges,
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the examiner’s decision rejecting claims 5, 6, 8,
12, and 13. Claims 1 through 4, 7, 9, 14, and 15, which are the only other claims
remaining in the application, stand allowed.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007