Ex parte KAWASHIMA et al. - Page 5




                  Appeal No.  1996-0833                                                                                                                   
                  Application No.  08/230,879                                                                                                             

                  routine and well known in the art, the examiner has not established on this record that there is a                                      

                  reasonable expectation of success of obtaining the required Mortierella microorganism mutant.                                           

                  Thus, the examiner has not established a prima facie case of obviousness.  Having concluded that the                                    

                  examiner has not established a prima facie case of obviousness, we do not reach the rebuttal evidence                                   

                  of unexpected results discussed on pages 12-15 of the brief and on pages 11-13 of the reply brief.                                      

                           The rejection of claims 1-28 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Akimoto or                                       

                  Idemitsu ‘494 or Idemitsu ‘690 each taken in view of Crueger is reversed.                                                               

                                                                 OTHER MATTERS                                                                            

                           The examiner’s attention is directed to the Information Disclosure Statement filed November                                    

                  24, 1999 (Paper No. 33) for appropriate action taking.                                                                                  

                                                                   CONCLUSION                                                                             

                           To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1-28 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                                      

                  being unpatentable over Akimoto or Idemitsu ‘494 or Idemitsu ‘690 each taken in view of Crueger is                                      

                  REVERSED.                                                                                                                               











                                                                          - 5 -                                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007