Ex parte FRASCOTTI et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                 
                                                               Paper No. 27           


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                  ________________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                  ________________                                    
                      Ex parte GIANNI FRASCOTTI, PAOLA COSMINA                        
                                  and GUIDO GRANDI                                    
                                  ________________                                    
                                Appeal No. 1996-1042                                  
                             Application No. 07/810,138                               
                                  ________________                                    
                                HEARD:  March 9, 2000                                 
                                  ________________                                    

          Before WINTERS, ROBINSON and LORIN, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       



                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision                     
          rejecting claims 9 through 15, which are all of the claims                  
          pending in the application.                                                 

                                         -1-                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007