Ex parte DIEKHAUS et al. - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 1996-1288                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/227,576                                                                                                             

                          This is a decision on an appeal from the refusal of the                                                                       
                 examiner to allow claims 2 through 6, 8 through 17, 19, 21                                                                             
                 through 25 and 27 through 32 as amended subsequent to the                                                                              
                 final rejection.   These are all of the claims pending in the2                                                                                                         
                 application.                                                                                                                           
                          The subject matter on appeal relates to a process for                                                                         
                 removal of sulfonated and unsulfonated organic phosphorous                                                                             
                 compounds from a starting solution which is a reaction product                                                                         
                 of sulfonation of aryl phosphines by sulfuric acid.  The                                                                               
                 process comprises extraction of the sulfuric acid with 40 to                                                                           
                 90 mol of a principal amine which is sparingly soluble or                                                                              
                 insoluble in water.  This appealed subject matter is                                                                                   
                 adequately illustrated by independent claim 28 which reads as                                                                          
                 follows:                                                                                                                               
                          28. A process for removal of sulfonated and unsulfonated                                                                      
                 organic phosphorus compounds from a starting solution which is                                                                         
                 a reaction product of sulfonation of aryl phosphines by                                                                                
                 sulfuric acid, which process comprises extraction of said                                                                              
                 sulfuric acid with 40 to 90 mol, per mol of the sulfonic acid                                                                          
                 radicals of said sulfonated organic phosphorus compounds                                                                               

                          2By an apparently inadvertent oversight, the amendment-                                                                       
                 after-final filed March 29, 1995 has not been clerically                                                                               
                 entered notwithstanding the entry-authorization of the                                                                                 
                 examiner in the advisory action mailed April 11, 1995.  This                                                                           
                 oversight should be corrected upon return of the application                                                                           
                 to the jurisdiction of the examiner.                                                                                                   
                                                                           2                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007