THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ARUN SRIVASTAVA
____________
Appeal No. 1996-2009
Application No. 07/982,193
____________
Heard: March 23, 2000
____________
Before WINTERS, GRON, and LORIN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LORIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. ' 134 from the final
rejection of claims 1-3, 7-12, and 14-19. On consideration
of the record, we affirm the examiner's decision rejecting
these claims under the judicially
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007