THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte STEN BERNTSEN
_____________
Appeal No. 1996-2012
Application 08/146,0251
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CAROFF, HANLON and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This decision on appeal relates to the final rejection of
claims 7-15. Subsequent to the final rejection, appellant
canceled claims 7 and 10 while adding new claims 16-17.
Accordingly, the claims before us on appeal are claims 8-9 and
1Application for patent filed November 08, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007