THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAG ROMELL
____________
Appeal No. 1996-2802
Application No. 08/140,1421
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner
finally rejecting claims 1, 3-18 and 20-22. At that point in
the prosecution, claims 2 and 19 had been canceled. Claim 12
1Application for patent filed November 3, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007