Ex parte HECKEROTH et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                            Paper No. 28              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                          Ex parte RUDIGER HECKEROTH, and                             
                                   BERND PETZOLD                                      
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1996-2958                                  
                               Application 08/150,053                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                              HEARD: FEBRUARY 10, 2000                                
                                   _______________                                    

          Before HAIRSTON, RUGGIERO and HECKER, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of               
          claims 1 through 17.  An amendment after final rejection was                
          filed August 7, 1995 and was entered by the Examiner as                     
          indicated in the Advisory Action dated August 30,1995.  In                  
          this Advisory Action, the Examiner stated that the rejections               
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007