Paper No. 32
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte HARUYUKI KOIZUMI,
HAJIME IWAI, KOUJI ONO
and HIDEKI CHUJYO
______________
Appeal No. 1996-3003
Application 08/175,1821
_______________
HEARD: JANUARY 11, 2000
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, HECKER and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HECKER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1 Application for patent filed December 29, 1993. According to
applicants, this application is a continuation of Application 07/953,386,
filed September 30, 1992, which is a continuation of Application 07/884,309,
filed May 11, 1992, now U.S. Patent No. 5,175,422, issued December 29, 1992;
which is a continuation of Application 07/537,134, filed June 13, 1990.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007