Appeal No. 1996-3167 Page 4
Application No. 07/974,834
59-220686 Dec. 12,
1984
59-52999 Dec. 22, 1984
Claims 4, 6, 7, 13, 14, 26, 28 to 31, 34, 35 and 41 to 52
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as
being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and
distinctly claim the subject matter which the appellants
regard as the invention.
Claims 4, 6, 7, 13, 14, 26, 28 to 31, 34, 35 and 41 to 52
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as the
specification, as originally filed, does not provide support
for the invention as is now claimed.
Claims 4, 6, 7, 13, 14, 26, 28 to 31, 34, 35 and 41 to 52
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Patterson in view of Kumpf.
Claims 4 and 52 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Patterson in view of Kumpf as applied
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007