Ex parte ROBINSON et al. - Page 4




                     Appeal No. 1996-3708                                                                                                                                              
                     Application 07/474,742                                                                                                                                            


                     means for interconnecting at least two of said plurality of                                                                                                       
                     programmable signal processor means in a desired manner in                                                                                                        
                     response to said topological data received over said                                                                                                              
                     communications bus;                                                                                                                                               
                                c) a plurality of data bus means for connecting said                                                                                                   
                     plurality of programmable signal processor means to said                                                                                                          
                     matrix switching means; and                                                                                                                                       
                                d) at least one third bus means coupled to said core                                                                                                   
                     means and to said means for receiving and storing, for                                                                                                            
                     transmitting parametric data and said microinstructions to                                                                                                        
                     said means for receiving and storing of at least a plurality                                                                                                      
                     of said programmable signal processor means.                                                                                                                      
                                The Examiner relies upon the following reference:                                                                                                      
                     Engels et al. (Engels), "Concept and Implementation of a                                                                                                          
                     Powerful Multiprocessor System for Digital Signal Processing,"                                                                                                    
                     January 4, 1989.                                                                                                                                                  
                                Claims 1 through 13, 15 through 34 and 36 through 38                                                                                                   
                     stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 or in the alternative                                                                                                        
                     under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Engels.                                                                                                          
                                Rather then reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the                                                                                              
                     Examiner, reference is made to the briefs  and answer for the                           1                                                                         
                     respective details thereof.                                                                                                                                       




                                1 Appellants filed an appeal brief on February 15, 1996.                                                                                               
                     Appellants filed a reply brief on August 1, 1996 .  On August                                                                                                     
                     20, 1996, the Examiner mailed a communication stating that the                                                                                                    
                     reply brief has been entered and considered.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                          4                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007