Ex parte DOUGLAS - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                 
                                                               Paper No. 16           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                  ________________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                  ________________                                    
                              Ex parte GAVIN L. DOUGLAS                               
                                  ________________                                    
                                Appeal No. 1996-3750                                  
                              Application No. 08/321,058                              
                                  ________________                                    
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                  ________________                                    

          Before KRASS, BARRETT, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of               
          claims 3-5, 10-12, 15-17 and 22-24.  Appellant does not appeal              
          the final rejection of independent claims 1, 2, 13 and 14, nor              




                                         -1-                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007