THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No.39
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte BRENT A. FAIRBANKS
__________
Appeal No. 1996-4089
Application 08/227,2931
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before KRASS, BARRETT, and FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellant has appealed to the Board from the examiners’ final rejection of claims 17, 18, and
20 to 26, which constitute all of the pending claims in the application before us on appeal. Claims 1 to
16 and 19 have been canceled.
Application for patent filed April 13, 1994. According to appellant, the application is a continuation of1
Application 07/968,593, filed October 29, 1992, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007