THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal
and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WOO-BAEG-CHOI, GUY R. HUMPHREY, PAUL J. REIDER,
ICHIRO SHINKAI, ANDREW S. THOMPSON
and RALPH P. VOLANTE
____________
Appeal No. 1996-4090
Application No. 08/241,958
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, OWENS, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1
through 5, 9, 11, 12, 16 and 17 which are all the claims remaining in the application.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007