Ex parte KASAT et al. - Page 1




                            THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                  
                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in    
                     a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                                                      Paper No. 22                        
                                UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                      ____________                                                        
                                     BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                      ____________                                                        
                        Ex parte RADHAKPISHNA B. KASAT and BHALCHANDRA D. MOGHE                                           
                                                      ____________                                                        
                                                  Appeal No. 1996-4133                                                    
                                               Application No. 08/264,073                                                 
                                                      ____________                                                        
                                               HEARD: February 23, 2000                                                   
                                                      ____________                                                        

              Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, ROBINSON, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.                               
              ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                      

                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       

                     This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 - 15 and                
              17 - 27, which are all of the claims pending in this case.  Independent claim 1 is illustrative             
              of the subject matter on appeal and reads as follows:                                                       
                     1.  A gel stick composition comprising at least one alcohol selected from the group                  
              consisting of monohydric alcohols and polyhydric alcohols; water; and a soap gelling                        
              agent, the at least one alcohol being a solvent for the soap gelling agent, the composition                 
              including a sufficient amount of the soap gelling agent to form a solid stick composition,                  
              the soap gelling agent including alkali metal salts of fatty acids having carbon chain length               
              within the range of C -C , wherein at least 65% by weight, of the total weight of the soap                  
                                    12  22                                                                                

                                                            1                                                             





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007