Ex parte TERRELL et al. - Page 8


                     Appeal No. 1997-0006                                                                                                                                              
                     Application 08/409,946                                                                                                                                            

                     1365-66 (Fed. Cir. 1997); In re Merck & Co., 800 F.2d 1091, 1099,  231 USPQ 375, 381 (Fed.                                                                        
                     Cir. 1986); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 897, 225 USPQ 645, 651-52 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Klosak,                                                                  
                     455 F.2d 1077, 1080, 173 USPQ 14, 16 (CCPA 1972); In re D’Ancicco, 439 F.2d 1244, 1248,                                                                           
                     169 USPQ 303, 306 (CCPA 1971).  Thus, in the absence of evidence explaining the practical                                                                         
                     significance of such results and that the results are unexpected even in view of the admitted knowledge                                                           
                     in the art, we find that the evidence as a whole is more indicative of obviousness than nonobviousness.                                                           
                     See, e.g., Geisler, supra; Merck, supra; In re Hoffmann, 556 F.2d 539, 541, 194 USPQ 126, 128                                                                     
                     (CCPA 1977); Klosak, supra; In re Gershon, 372 F.2d 535, 537, 152 USPQ 602, 604 (CCPA                                                                             
                     1967).                                                                                                                                                            
                                Accordingly, on this record, we must agree with the examiner that appellants have failed to                                                            
                     establish that the combined teachings of Tamura and Kobata, taken in light of the knowledge in the art                                                            
                     as admitted by appellants, would not have provided one of ordinary skill in this art with the suggestion                                                          
                     of and a reasonable expectation of success in using an X-form, unmetallized, ortho-cyano substituted                                                              
                     phthalocyanine pigment in the manner disclosed in the reference in preparing a photosensitive recording                                                           
                     layer that has the characteristics taught therein.  In re Vaeck, 947 F.2d 488, 493, 20 USPQ2d 1438,                                                               
                     1442 (Fed. Cir. 1991), citing In re Dow Chemical Co.,   837 F.2d 469, 473, 5 USPQ2d 1529,                                                                         
                     1531(Fed. Cir. 1988).  Indeed, all that is required is a reasonable expectation of success, not absolute                                                          
                     predictability.  Merck, 874 F.2d at 808, 10 USPQ2d at 1847; In re O’Farrell, 853 F.2d 894, 903-                                                                   
                     04, 7 USPQ2d 1673, 1681 (Fed. Cir. 1988).                                                                                                                         
                                Accordingly, based on our consideration of the totality of the record before us, we have weighed                                                       
                     the evidence of obviousness found in the combined teachings of Tamura and Kobata with appellants’                                                                 
                     countervailing evidence of and argument for nonobviousness and conclude that the claimed invention                                                                
                     encompassed by appealed claims 1 through 11 and 14 through 19 would have been obvious as a matter                                                                 
                     of law under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                                                                                                                                     
                                The examiner’s decision is affirmed.                                                                                                                   





                                                                                        - 8 -                                                                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007