THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte KOJI NOGUCHI
______________
Appeal No. 1997-0008
Application 08/347,190
_______________
HEARD: February 22, 2000
_______________
Before KIMLIN, WARREN and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal and Opinion
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner refusing to allow
claims 7 and 8 as amended subsequent to the final rejection, which are all of the claims in the1
application.
We have carefully considered the record before us, and based thereon, find that we cannot
sustain the ground of rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph. The basis for the rejection is
1Amendment of December 19, 1995 (Paper No. 16). See also the amendment of November 21,
1994 (Paper No. 12).
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007