THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte FRANCOIS DESPREZ, JOHAN DEVENYNS, NICHOLAS TROUGHTON
and PAUL ESSEMAEKER
____________
Appeal No. 1997-0090
Application No. 08/083,183
____________
HEARD: February 10, 2000
____________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH, and GARRIS, Administrative
Patent Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 1-13.
Appealed claims 1 and 6 are representative and are
reproduced below:
1. A process for bleaching a chemical paper pulp to
obtain levels of brightness of at least 89E ISO, comprising:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007