Ex parte VANDENABEELE - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1997-0421                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 08/304,485                                                  

          polyoxyalkylene antistatic agent added in a separate outer                  
          layer.  The protective layer(s) are alleged to preserve the                 
          antistatic properties of the photographic material after a                  
          long storage period with the avoidance of water spot defects                
          and sticking problems associated with photographic materials                
          (specification, page 3).  Claim 1, the only independent claim               
          on appeal, is reproduced below.                                             
               1. A photographic silver halide material which comprises               
          a support and on one or both sides thereof at least one silver              
          halide emulsion layer and a protective antistress gelatin                   
          layer containing a synthetic clay wherein the said protective               
          antistress layer or a gelatin free antistatic afterlayer,                   
          coated over said antistress layer comprises a polyoxyalkylene               
          compound as an antistatic agent.                                            
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Chen et al. (Chen)            4,610,955                Sep. 09,             
          1986                                                                        
          Timmerman et al. (Timmerman)       5,252,445                Oct.            
          12, 1993                                                                    

               Claims 1-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being              
          unpatentable over Chen in view of Timmerman.                                
                                       OPINION                                        
               We have carefully considered all of the arguments                      
          advanced by appellant and the examiner and agree with                       








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007