THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JOHNNY ARNAUD
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-0537
Application 07/749,554
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, WARREN and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 3
and 7. Claim 2, the other claim remaining in the present
application, has been allowed by the examiner (see page 1 of
answer. Claim 1 is illustrative:
1. A system for the regeneration of contact media,
comprising:
a treatment vessel having a plurality of
vertically arranged chambers, each chamber
having a fluid inlet and a fluid outlet, said
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007