Ex parte JOLY et al. - Page 2




            Appeal No. 1997-0553                                                                              
            Application No. 08/409,191                                                                        


                   1.   A method for synthesizing a gate level description of an integrated circuit           
            module including a plurality of circuit blocks from a behavioral description of the module,       
            comprising:                                                                                       
                   synthesizing a first block in the plurality of blocks by processing the behavioral         
            description of the first block to produce a gate level description of the first block;            
                   generating a synthesis shell comprising a gate level description of a circuit having       
            fewer gates than the gate level description of the first block by reducing the number of          
            gates in the gate level description of the first circuit block, the synthesis shell having the    
            same input load and fanout as the first block, output delay relative to clock  as the first       
            block, output drive of the first block, setup/hold constraints on input signals relative to clock 
            as the first block, and delay from input to output for pass through signals as the first block;   
            and                                                                                               
                   synthesizing at least one other block in the plurality of blocks by processing the         
            behavioral description of the at least one other block with reference to the synthesis shell to   
            produce a gate level description of the at least one other block.                                 

                   The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the            

            appealed claims are:                                                                              
            Donath et al. (Donath)                 4,263,651                 Apr. 21, 1981                    
            Drumm et al. (Drumm)                   5,029,102                 Jul. 02, 1991                    
            Dangelo et al. (Dangelo)               5,222,030                 Jun. 22, 1993                    
                   Claims 1-28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                
            Drumm in view of Donath and Dangelo.                                                              
                   Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and the          
            appellants regarding the above-noted rejections, we make reference to the examiner's              
            answer (Paper No. 12, mailed Jul. 16, 1996) for the examiner's reasoning in support of the        


                                                      2                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007