Ex parte SHAMS et al. - Page 1




                                                        Paper No. 23                   
               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                            
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                   
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                     
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                   

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                   _______________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                   _______________                                     
                                Ex parte SOHEIL SHAMS                                  
                                   and DAVID B. SHU                                    
                                    ______________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1997-0917                                  
                              Application 08/309,565                                   
                                   _______________                                     
                                   ON BRIEF                                            
                                   _______________                                     
          Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH and HECKER, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                      
          HECKER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of                
          claims 1 through 13, all claims pending in the application.                  
          The invention relates to computer architecture, and in                       
          particular, to a dynamically reconfigurable switch for                       
          connecting processing elements in processor arrays in Single                 

                                           1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007