Ex parte MADAN et al. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                   publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.             

                                                            Paper No. 13              


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                              Ex parte SANJEEV MADAN,                                 
                                 JAMES R. JASENAK,                                    
                                        and                                           
                                   DAVID L. FAIR                                      
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1997-0956                                  
                             Application No. 08/313,488                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before WINTERS, PAK, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                           

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                  
          from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1 through 12, 14                
          through 20 and 22, which are all of the claims pending in the               
          application.  Claim 1 was amended subsequent to the final                   

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007