Ex parte DEMOTT et al. - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 1997-1001                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/369,202                                                                                                             


                          Appealed claim 1 is representative and is reproduced                                                                          
                 below:                                                                                                                                 
                          1.       An aqueous binder solution suitable for applying to                                                                  
                          fiberglass as a binder, said binder having high binding                                                                       
                          efficiency, said composition prepared by the                                                                                  
                          steps comprising:                                                                                                             
                                   (A) selecting an aqueous resole having a pH greater                                                                  
                          than 7, prepared by reacting phenol with excess                                                                               
                 formaldehyde under alkaline conditions;                                                                                                
                                   (B) adding to said aqueous resole (A) urea in an                                                                     
                 amount            from about 20 to about 70 parts by weight based on                                                                   
                 100 parts                  by weight of the phenol/formaldehyde resole                                                                 
                 solids in                           component A and reacting to form a urea-                                                           
                 extended                                                                                                                               
                          prereact;                                                                                                                     
                                   (C) dissolving into said prereact from about 1 to                                                                    
                 about             10 weight percent melamine based on the weight of                                                                    
                 the solids                 in the urea-extended phenol/formaldehyde                                                                    
                 prereact (B);                                                                                                                          
                                   wherein said alkaline resole contains sufficient                                                                     
                 excess            formaldehyde to react with said urea and said                                                                        
                 melamine on a                       substantially equimolar basis.                                                                     
                          The reference of record relied upon by the examiner is:                                                                       
                 Coventry et al. (Coventry)                                     5,300,562                           April 5,                            
                 1994                                                                                                                                   
                          The appealed claims stand rejected  under 35 U.S.C. § 103    2                                                                
                 as unpatentable over Coventry.                                                                                                         

                          2The claims stand or fall together.  See the brief at                                                                         
                 page 5.                                                                                                                                
                                                                           2                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007