Appeal No. 1997-1111 Page 5
Application No. 08/105,899
Claim 11 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
unpatentable over Ueda in view of Ying.
Claim 11 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
unpatentable over Mega in view of Ying.
Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced
by the examiner and the appellant regarding the above-noted
rejections, we make reference to the examiner's answer (Paper
No. 13, mailed July 19, 1996) for the examiner's complete
reasoning in support of the rejections, and to the appellant's
brief (Paper No. 12, filed April 10, 1996) and reply brief
(Paper No. 14, filed September 23, 1996) for the appellant's
arguments thereagainst. Only those arguments actually made by
the appellant have been considered in this decision.
Arguments which the appellant could have made but chose not to
make in the briefs have not been considered. See 37 CFR
1.192(a).
OPINION
In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have
carefully considered the subject matter on appeal, the
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007