Ex parte CANTRELL et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                            Paper No. 19              

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                     Ex parte THOMAS G. CANTRELL, SEBNEM JAJI,                        
                                AMAL A. SHAHEEN and                                   
                                   RICHARD B. WARD                                    
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1997-1184                                  
                               Application 08/206,706                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING and FRAHM, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 3              
          through 6, 8 and 10 through 15.                                             
               The disclosed invention relates to a method and apparatus              
          for managing a file system cache in a distributed file system.              

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007