Ex parte REDDY et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1997-1197                                                         
          Application 08/130,255                                                       

               The Examiner relies on the following prior art                          
          references:                                                                  
               Fujisawa et al. (Fujisawa)   4,926,166      May 15, 1990                
               Kajihara                     4,929,085      May 29, 1990                
               Okazawa et al. (Okazawa)     5,034,733     July 23, 1991                

               Claims 1, 2, 9-12, and 15-17 stand rejected under                       
          35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Kajihara.                         
               Claims 7, 8, 13, 14, 18, and 19 stand rejected under                    
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Kajihara and                      
          Okazawa.                                                                     
               Claims 3, 4, and 22-24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                   
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Kajihara and Fujisawa.                      
               Claims 25 and 26 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                
          being unpatentable over Kajihara, Fujisawa, and Okazawa.                     
               We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 6) (pages                    
          referred to as "FR__"), the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 12)                 
          (pages referred to as "EA__"), and the communication  entered2                       
          September 13, 1996 (Paper No. 15) for a statement of the                     
          Examiner's position and to the Appeal Brief (Paper No. 11)                   
          (pages referred to as "Br__") and the Reply Brief (Paper                     


            Which should be in the form of a "Supplemental2                                                                       
          Examiner's Answer."                                                          
                                        - 4 -                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007