The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL J. MOTTI, JAMES P. REVARD,
and RANDY E. BERLIN
____________
Appeal No. 1997-1479
Application No. 08/418,579
____________
HEARD: OCTOBER 11, 2000
____________
Before COHEN, NASE, and JENNIFER D. BAHR, Administrative Patent
Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal addresses the rejection of claims 2 through 7
and 9 through 16, all of the claims remaining in the
application.
Appellants’ invention pertains to an automatic
defibrillator simulator and to a method for enabling an
instructor to train a subject in learning steps and conditions
of a defibrillation procedure. A basic understanding of the
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007