Ex parte JANNEY - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1997-1578                                                        
          Application No. 08/212,292                                                  


          to generate and store the digital message in said message                   
          memory;                                                                     
               manually activated controls associated with said housing               
          for selecting said characters of said digital message on a                  
          one-by-one basis for storage in said message memory by said                 
          message store circuit;                                                      
               a battery for powering said alphanumeric display, message              
          memory, and message store circuit; and                                      
               a cable attaching said battery to said housing for                     
          powering said message memory, said message store circuit, said              
          driver, and said display.                                                   
               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                        
          Young                    3,521,049                     Jul. 21,             
          1970                                                                        
          Sebestyen                     3,976,995                     Aug.            
          24, 1976                                                                    
          Piguet                   4,385,291                     May  24,             
          1983                                                                        
          A. F. Newell et al. (Newell), “An alphanumeric display as a                 
          communication aid for the dumb,” Medical and Biological                     
          Engineering, pp. 84-88 (January 1975).                                      
               Claims 12-19 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103              
          as being unpatentable over Newell in view of Young, Piguet,                 
          and Sebestyen.                                                              
               Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellant and the               
          Examiner, reference is made to the Brief and Answer for the                 
          respective details.                                                         
                                       OPINION                                        
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007