Ex parte ONO - Page 5




                 Appeal No. 1997-1592                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/325,566                                                                                                             


                 (Col. 9, line 55 to col. 10, line 20).  These sleeves were then used as developer-retaining members in a                               

                 developing device.  (Col. 10, lines 39-45).  Of note, sleeves 2, 3 and 4 had resistances ranging from 1                                
                 x 10  to 1 x 10  ohms.  (Col. 10, table 1).7          9                                                                                                                    



                                                                       Opinion                                                                          

                          The examiner has rejected claims 5, 6 and 8-13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable                                       

                 over Aizawa.  The examiner cites Aizawa as disclosing a structure comprising a main body of                                            

                 aluminum, an aluminum oxide layer formed by anodization of the main body and a surface layer of a                                      

                 synthetic resin having carbon black dispersed therein.  (Examiner’s Answer, p. 4).  According to the                                   

                 examiner, the porosity of the anodized layer is inherent in the Aizawa structure as aluminum oxide layers                              

                 formed by anodization are porous unless the layer is further treated to seal the pores.  (Examiner’s                                   

                 Answer, p. 4).                                                                                                                         

                          The examiner recognizes that Aizawa does not explicitly disclose the particle size of the carbon                              

                 particles in the surface layer.  Yet, the examiner concludes that absent a showing of criticality for this                             

                 size limitation, the particle size would have been within the general skill of a worker in the art at the time                         

                 of the invention to determine usable and optimum sizes for the particles dispersed in the surface layer.                               

                 (Examiner’s Answer, p. 4).  Furthermore, the examiner cites Kirk-Othmer as disclosing average                                          

                 particle diameters for carbon black of less than 5 Fm.   (Examiner’s Answer, p. 6).                                                    


                                                                           5                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007