Ex parte SHAMSHOUM et al. - Page 1
Legal Research Home >
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2000 > Ex parte SHAMSHOUM et al. - Page 1
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte EDWAR S. SHAMSHOUM, DAVID J. RAUSCHER and
DOUGLAS A. BURMASTER
____________
Appeal No. 1997-1684
Application No. 08/223,9161
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CAROFF, KIMLIN, and JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative
Patent Judges.
CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This decision on appeal relates to the final rejection of
claims 13-14 and 29-70. Claims 1-12, all the other claims
remaining in the application, stand withdrawn from
consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a
non-elected invention and, thus, are not before us on appeal.
1Application for patent filed April 6, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Last modified: November 3, 2007
|
