Appeal No. 1997-1921
Application 08/099,709
Claim 1 does not preclude the use of a switch to
determine, or effect, prioritization. As such, Grimmett
clearly discloses at least the last element of the claim and
we find appellants’ argument to the contrary unpersuasive.
Appellants have not convinced us of any error in our
decision of April 28, 2000. Accordingly, while we have
granted appellants’ request for rehearing to the extent that
we have
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007