THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No.
16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ANTHONY V. GROSSI
and PAUL E. STOTT
____________
Appeal No. 1997-1992
Application No. 08/115,3881
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, WARREN, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 10 and 15 through 20. Claims 1-9, 11, 13,
14 and 21, which are all of the remaining claims pending in
this application, stand withdrawn from further consideration
by the examiner as drawn to a non-elected invention.
1Application for patent filed September 2, 1993.
According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/729,515, filed July 12, 1991, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007