THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LEONHARD REINDL, FOLKHARD MULLER, CLEMENS RUPPEL,
WOLF-ECKHART BULST, and FRANZ SEIFERT
____________
Appeal No. 1997-2008
Application No. 08/270,931
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 43, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
Appellants' invention relates to a sensor having both a
passive sensor element and a passive reference element, each
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007