Ex parte GURNE et al. - Page 8




          Appeal No. 1997-2049                                                        
          Application 08/431,130                                                      


          incorporating an off-board system like the console 140 of                   
          Boscove therein, as required by the appealed claims, other                  
          than the hindsight provided to one who first views the                      
          appellants’ disclosure.  Hindsight reconstruction, however, is              
          not a proper basis for establishing the obviousness of the                  
          subject matter of claims.  See In re Fritch, 972 F.2d 1260,                 
          1266, 23 USPQ2d 1780, 1784 (Fed. Cir. 1992).  It follows that               
          we will not sustain the standing § 103 rejection.                           






















                                          8                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007