THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL H. CONNER
and NURCAN COSKUN
____________
Appeal No. 1997-2055
Application No. 08/175,873
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 7, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
Appellants' invention relates to a method for controlling
the execution of object oriented programs. In the method, an
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007