THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HEINZ-WERNER KEESEN
____________
Appeal No. 1997-2398
Application No. 08/354,9291
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 2, 8-12 and 22.
Claims 3-7, 13-21, 23 and 24 contain allowable subject matter
(Answer, page 1).
1Application for patent filed December 12, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007