Ex parte SCHOEPE - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)              
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                 
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                            Paper No. 14              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                               Ex parte ADOLF SCHOEPE                                 
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1997-2508                                  
                               Application 08/329,463                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   

               This appeal involves claims 4 through 6. The notice of                 
          appeal dated July 17, 1996 specifies claims 4 through 6 and 9.              
          However, a later notice of appeal dated September 20, 1996                  
          only sets forth claims 4 through 6.  Consistent with the                    
          above, and the statement in the appeal brief (page 1) that                  

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007